flotsam // caroline crew


3 Comments

Poetry as Hypertext

I have a friend who is wonderful, and also about to embark on thesis made of poems that deal with the paradoxes of infinity. He likes to mix maths into his poetry. I have a couple of essay collections about the intersection of contemporary poetry and science, and in an effort to help (sort of) I offered to lend these books to him (The Measured Word ed. Kurt Brown and Contemporary Poetry and Contemporary Science ed. Robert Crawford). In the process of digging them out of my very spindly book case, I read a few of the essays. It seems a mark of how much my mind has opened up in the ten months or so since I first read these books of quite how much the ideas presented struck me.

Most important to what I experienced yesterday was Stephanie Strickland’s essay ‘Seven-League Boots:   Poetry, Science, and Hypertext’. Even more importantly, it is archived and available to read online here.

Hypertext.

This exchange between you and I is hypertext. The internet is the largest and larger hypertext. A hypertext, defined by Strickland, is fundamentally thus:

In a hypertext, any part can link to any other, or be unlinked, or re-linked, at any time. Hypertexts live on computers. There is never only one way to read them.

She argues that the poem too is hypertext, can be hypertext.

I agree that some poems, at least, exist as hypertext.

Particularly some of the poems from Warsaw Bikini, a book of poems by Sandra Simonds. I have read this book a few times, and most often I enjoy it. It’s quite a deluge to read all at once. Reading it again, this past week, it struck me that I was drawn to the shorter, tighter, more lyric poems, such as ‘Tomorrow’s Bright Bracelets’, rather than the poems that sway across the page, long and unapologetic in detouring and getting lost.

Tomorrow’s Bright Bracelets

Winter lungs are white trees.

Winter lungs are bare white trees.

There are no ornaments because this isn’t Christmas.

 

Put a silver ribbon in your hair.

Put on all of your bright bracelets and walk out into the feathered snow.

My eyes are pale like a crust of ice over a long river.

 

What would the gift-givers say if they saw us now?

What will they tell the world?

 

And when you are home: Open

all of the windows in your small house- take off

 

all of your clothes, and then take off all of your underclothes

and watch your flushed cheek turn grey in the mirror.

I love this poem. I wish I had written it. When I read it, and type it, it feels almost as if I could have done. However, my point is that on this read through I felt less love for the longer poems. An example, the opening poem ‘I Serengeti You’ or ‘Ponce de Leon as a Floridaphile’, to a lesser extent ‘Dear Montana’ which is published in GutCult.

I realised though, after reading Strickland’s essay, that these poems, in order for me to enjoy them fully, needed to be released from my imposed lyric and more narrative reading. Released into hypertext.

To read as a hypertext is to find your own way through a poem. To make connections in a non-linear fashion. To link and relink and unlink. In this way, the poems that seemed too much, a deluge, became an opportunity. Dynamic.

So thank you hypertext. You are making me connect.


3 Comments

PRINT vs SCREEN. or why it doesn’t actually matter and online lit mags are awesome.

A couple of months back in the charmingly awkward getting-to-know-one-another stage in my current workshop group, I admitted I was pretty dubious of online literary magazines.

Yes, yes, I know– completely hypocritical for someone who vomits this stuff about poetry on the internet and is (super) thankful that you guys read it. Still, something about online magazines made me uncomfortable. Part of this feeling was due to the utter freedom of the internet. Anyone can post any old shite and call themselves editor of a magazine. The slush pile of print magazines is careful picked through by a dogged editor, and as such I only get the creme of the crop.

Clearly, this is a stupid, stupid point of view. Just as there are crappy print magazines, there are crappy print magazines. Physicality is no guarantee of quality. Whether the medium is screen or paper it’s still on the reader to seek out the wheat from the chaff. I think I’ll always feel different reading something with its weight in my hands– it is a different experience, and I do like to scribble and talk back to poems. Still the poor student in me loves that online lit magazines are by and large free. If you don’t like one’s content, you haven’t forked out for it. I know we’re not meant to put a price on art, but sometimes money does get in the way.

So, I’m still rectifying my earlier stupidity (I guess that is pretty much the course of life), and I thought I’d share my own favourite online havens for poems:

  • > kill author. This journal for the ‘mostly alive’ has got to be one of the slickest around, and the anonymous editors are passionate about the online platform. This isn’t an online extension of a print magazine, > kill author is a purely online publication, and only prints the most inventive, imaginative and individual poems around. If you’re looking for something exciting, look here.
  • PANK Magazine. Online and in print (but not carbon copies), PANK publishes some great stuff, and their blog is pretty entertaining too. The simplicity of the layout for each contributor’s work makes it a pleasure to read, and the editors have a great eye for slightly cutting, often darkly comic poems. (Another plus about online mags are archives– yay– so you can riffle through and find gems like this from Bruce Cohen)
  • The Continental Review is all over new media. By which I mean this isn’t an online magazine as you (or I) know it. It’s a collection of interactions between poetry and cinema and other multi-media. So much more than recorded readings and discussions, Continental Review is opening up whole new [plat]forms for poetry. Which create awesome things like this:
  • HTMLGIANT. Pretty much does what it says. A giant of online lit mags, constantly updating with interesting things. Truly it’s own creation and not the translation of print onto screen. Great recorded readings. Also, really, really funny.
  • Front Porch Journal. This is the online presence and journal of Texas State, and it’s gorgeous. I hate to repeat myself with these comments, but SO much of what makes a good online literary magazine (aside from decent content) is not looking like some desperate 15-year-old girls MySpace page. And this is a fine-looking thing. With excellent poems.

Apart from these five, I have to mention Virginia Commonwealth University’s wonderful Blackbird, and the downloadable PDF magazine with stunning illustrations, five dials. Fortuneately there’s a lot of chat just now about the online literary magazine… so if you’re on the prowl, head to Anis Shivani’s article in the HuffPost for more recommendations, or to Flavorwire’s 10 Online Literary Magazines You Should Read.


3 Comments

Top of the Pile: What I’m reading now #2

A Quark for Mister Mark: 101 Poems About Science (ed. Maurice Riordan + Jon Turney)

Another of the anthologies I’ve recently collected. This is a beautifully chaotic book. It’s sat by my bed for a week or so, and I’ve flicked through it most nights and I still can’t work out how or if it’s organised. Stretching from Dryden to the Romantics to Jo Shapcott and Diane Ackermann. What I loved about this anthology, aside from its endearing messiness, was the range of themes deemed to be ‘about science’. Astronomy, genetics, atoms, mad cow disease, chemistry, aliens and botany.

A real joy to pick through– current favourite is this poem, by the late, great, Michael Donaghy:

Touch

We knew she was clever because of her hands.
Hers, the first opposable thumb. Shards of her hip and skull
Suggest she was young, thirteen perhaps,
When the flash flood drowned her. Erect she stood
Lithe as a gymnast, four feet tall.

Our innocent progenitor.
Sleek furred technician of flint and straw.
Here are her knuckle bones.

I know her touch. Though she could easily snap
My wrist, she is gentle in my dream.
She probes my face, scans my arm,
She touches my hand to know me.
Her eyes are grey in the dream, and bright.

Little mother, forgive me.
I wake you for answers in the night
Like any infant. Tell me about touch.
What necessities designed your hands and mine?
Did you kill, carves, gesture to god or gods?
Did the caress shape your hand or your hand the caress?

Share


2 Comments

Now for the real election

The race for the prestigious position of Oxford’s next Professor of Poetry is ON.

After last year’s absolute mess thanks to Ruth Padel and her smearing of Derek Walcott the five year tenure is once again open. There have been rumours circulating for a while (my favourite whisperings being Alice Oswald and Douglas Dunn), but finally the nominations are out!

Eleven people have put themselves forward for the honour– it only pays £7000 per year, but who wouldn’t want to the next in the line that includes Auden and Heaney.

So these are the nominees (taken from this article in The Independent by Jonathan Brown):

Paula Claire

Artist and lecturer who has been writing and performing since the 1960s and whose online archive contains more than 5,000 examples of her work.

Michael George Gibson

Stood as parliamentary candidate in Tatton for the True English Poetry Party. Describes himself as “poet, husbandman and tunemaker”.

Roger Lewis

Acclaimed biographer of Anthony Burgess and Peter Sellers, but also known as the author of the Christmas round-robin parody Seasonal Suicide Notes.

Chris Mann

South African academic, poet and musician who spent his early career working with his country’s rural poor. He studied at Oxford and speaks Zulu and Afrikaans.

Geoffrey Hill

Favourite to win the post. The former professor of English at Leeds University is a distinguished poet who enjoys backing from some of Oxford’s top scholars.

Michael Horowitz

Celebrated beat poet who organised the 1965 Royal Albert Hall Poetry Internationale – the best-attended poetry reading ever staged in Britain.

Seán Haldane

Poet, former part-time farmer and neuropsychologist who was inspired as a student by the then Oxford Professor of Poetry Robert Graves.

Steve Larkin

Founded the performance group Hammer and Tongue in 2003, which blends hip hop and world music styles at vibrant “poetry-slam” events in unusual venues.

Stephen Moss

A former literary editor of The Guardian newspaper. Now a feature writer, his campaign slogan is a variation of Barack Obama’s – “Yes We Scan!”

Robert P Lacey

This self-confessed lay poet studied modern history at Oxford before becoming a doctor. If elected, he has promised to write a poem a week and publish it online.

Vaughan Pilikian

Filmmaker and Sanskrit scholar has pledged to herald a new era for the professorship using poetry as a “weapon, bloodsoaked and glinting”.

Personally, my money’s on Geoffrey Hill, and I think he’d be wonderful, but secretly I’d really like Sean Haldane to win. I haven’t investigated his poetry yet, but I think it would be really interesting to have a scientist in such an influential position– I find the crossover field that’s opening up in research between the ‘two cultures’ really intriguing.

Anyway, if I find a bookie taking bets, I might even be tempted to take a punt; and Oxford students/ graduates out there –GO VOTE!

Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 847 other followers